Develop Site Procedures that Conform with Regulatory Requirements
Data Integrity App |
◦ Single or multiple procedures
◦ Standard templates for documents
◦ Training on the procedures
The
pharmaceutical industry is overloaded with regulatory documents, such as standard
operating procedures (SOP),protocols and working practices, and needs a robust,
understandable and effective architecture model to drive compliance.
Once
the architecture is clearly defined, it’s important that the documents
themselves should be easy to use and lead to compliance.
Remember,
compliance is achieved through simplicity and clarity, not complexity or
extensive detail.
The
pharmaceutical industry could not function without all of its regulated
documents, and there is nowhere where this is truer than in a manufacturing
site.
RULES
TO KEEP DOCUMENTS UNDERSTOOD
In
writing the control documents, there are rules to guide the creation and
management of controlling documents. Ultimately, the guidance is that the
documents themselves should be clear, easy to use and lead to compliance.
1.
Aim for simplicity and clarity, avoiding complexity and the drive to cover all
eventualities. Organizations must seek opportunities to reduce complexity as
this will enhance the likelihood that people will comply, and result in fewer
errors. When organizations try to cover every possible situation, the
documentation becomes so complex it becomes practically impossible to remain
compliant with it.
2. Be outcome oriented. Building on the first rule, it is
important to define the outcome required, not the input expected. When
organizations define the input, or activity, then the process can be adhered to
without meeting the regulatory obligations set by the regulator. When the
outcome is defined, then the tasks become those that are required to meet the
outcome, and compliance is not achieved unless the outcome is right.
3. Don’t aim for perfection; use a risk-based model. The goal is to develop a good system that is fit for the purpose without a lot of complexity. Inevitably there will be circumstances that are not catered for within the documents; do not expect every possible eventuality to be covered.
High
frequency risks must be covered but low frequency high-impact risks are better
managed by people reacting to the crisis rather than trying to mandate behavior
a priori for every possible event. Good controlled document architecture
requires a risk based approach.
5. Ensure different document types have clear guidelines for the different content required. It has to be clear whether a specific document mandates process or simply provides guidance; the selected document type must also reflect this intent.
For example, policy documents set the ambition, a
quality management system (QMS) lays out the scope, SOPs define how the scope
is to be met and work instructions and other documents cover specific needs
without covering all eventualities.
This means that any situation that is not completely aligned with the way
things were operationally when the SOP was written, now run the risk of causing
unnecessary compliance failure.
7. Manage all regulated documents in the same repository. Having multiple systems or, worse, no system at all, makes it difficult to view the entire portfolio. If documents are in different locations then employees run the risk of not knowing where to look for the definitive version of documents.
It
becomes difficult to quickly assess the impact of a change and there is a
significant risk of personally held (and therefore uncontrolled) versions being
used to execute critical processes.
8. Ensure vital training is proportionate to the level of involvement. If a role is central to the execution of a process then organizations need to make sure that the right people have received training. If, however, a role is involved only occasionally in the process, or influences only a small section of it, then the training for that role needs to be appropriate for the level of involvement.
This requires on-demand training and training courses that
target sub-components of the process. Training everyone on everything is
neither popular nor effective.
10. Make sure that creating and deploying new documentation and processes is not a “once and done” activity. Organizations must enable the business to support continuous improvement and monitoring of the document portfolio.
They must also establish robust governance processes and
infrastructure to provide effective oversight of the portfolio and enable
rigorous monitoring to identify areas of weakness and opportunities in the
portfolio.
Across the internet, there are millions of resources are available which provide information about Everything.
If you found all content under one roof then it will save your time, effort & you will more concentrated on your important activity.
![]() |
Data Integrity App |
Our Data integrity app will helpful for understanding what Data integrity & CSV really means & How 21 CFR Part 11, EU Annex 11 & other regulatory guidelines affects in pharmaceutical Industry.
- Basic Data Integrity Concepts
- ERES & Its Requirement
- CSV & Its best practices
- Mock Inspection and General Q&A
- Checklist for inspection
- Inspection Readiness
- Useful SOP’s
- Stay Regulatory Compliant.
“Stay One Step Ahead in Pharma IT Compliance”
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.innovativeapps.dataintegrity
Try our "Data Integrity" app which helps you to better understand current regulatory agencies thinking on Data Integrity & CSV.
Comments
Post a Comment